

A Fool's ErrandIs there technically a channel deep enough for VLCCs in Dixon Entrance? Yes—but relying on that narrow sliver of deeper water is a fool's errand that ignores every principle of maritime safety.This lone viable shipping lane is an extremely tight needle to thread, a constrictive corridor where one mistake means disaster. It's hemmed in immediately on both sides by notoriously shallow, shifting shoals.
VLCC DraftThe massive ship sits impossibly deepShoal DepthDeadly shallows right beside the shipping laneThe GapOnly 10 metres separating safe passage from catastropheMargin for ErrorEffectively zero room for mistakes in a chaotic environmentA massive, impossibly heavy 22-metre deep ship right next to a 12-metre deep shelf, fighting massive tides in a narrow chute, located in one of the world's most aggressive maritime environments.
These aren't abstract concerns or exaggerated fears. They are hard, physical constraints that cannot be wished away by political will or industry lobbying. This is basic mathematics and physics—and the equation doesn't work.The fight to protect BC's northern coast from unsuitable supertanker traffic requires public pressure, political accountability, and continued vigilance. Here's how you can make a difference:Contact your MP and MLA to demand they oppose VLCC traffic through Dixon EntranceSupport organizations working to protect coastal waters and marine ecosystemsShare this information with your community and on social mediaAttend public consultations and make your voice heardSupport Indigenous-led initiatives to protect traditional territories